Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy Journal

Volume  8, Issue 2, April - June 2015, Pages 45-51
 

Original Article

Association of Manual Examination with Radiological Examination in Assessment of Lumbar Intervertebral Mobility in Asymptomatic Subjects: A Cross-Sectional Study

Nisha Rani Jamwal*, Senthil P. Kumar**

*Senior Physiotherapist, Department of Physiotherapy, Fortis Super Speciality Hospital, Phase- VIII, Mohali, Punjab. **Professor and Principal, M.M Institute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, M.M University, Mullana-Ambala, 133-207, Haryana, India

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.21088/potj.0974.5777.8215.1

Abstract

 Background and purpose: Clinical examination of lumbar intervertebral mobility (LIVM) involves manual application of force on lumbar spinous processes to localize the symptoms while radiological examination involved functional (flexion-neutral-extension) radiography. The objective of this study was to evaluate the concurrent (criterion-related) validity of central postero-anterior (PA) pressure when compared to functional radiography in assessment of LIVM in asymptomatic participants. Materials and methods: Assessor-blinded cross-sectional study with random-order repeated-measures design was performed on 48 consented asymptomatic adult participants of either gender (34 male, 14 female), with mean age 23.6 ± 4.8 years. Central PA pressure assessment was done and graded using the seven-point joint play grading scale of Stanley Paris (0- ankylosed, 6- unstable) while functional radiography and manual tracing were done to measure intersegmental anterior and/or posterior rotations and/or translations. Karl-Pearson’s correlation co-efficient was used for analysis in SPSS version 11.5 for Windows. Results: It is evident that there was a comparable change in the segmental mobility measured using manual and radiological examination in all the subjects studied. This finding is specifically noted between the JPGS with posterior rotation and anterior translation. E.g., a normal mobility on JPGS at L1 was seen with normal anterior translation and posterior rotation values from X-ray but not in posterior translation and anterior rotation. Conclusion: The study showed that manual examination of intervertebral mobility using central PA pressure was comparable to the radiological assessment of intersegmental mobility of the spine in the five subjects studied. This significant correlation was noted especially for the anterior translation and posterior rotation radiological measurements with the manual assessment using the central PA pressure. The joint play grading scale was a useful clinical tool to measure and record intervertebral mobility in the normal subjects studied.

Keywords: Physical Examination; Concurrent Validity; Lumbar Spine Mobility; Manual Therapy.

Corresponding Author : Senthil P. Kumar**