Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy Journal

Volume  13, Issue 1, JAN-MAR 2020, Pages 29-40
 

Original Article

Compare The Effectiveness of Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) and Mirror Therapy (MT) in Stroke Patients Based on Severity

Niranjan Kumar1, Niraj Kumar2, Shekhar Singh3, Shashank Kumar4, Nishu Sharma5

1Ph.DScholar, OPJS University, Churu, Rajasthan 331303, India, 2Associate Professor 4,5Assistant Professor, Department Physiotherapy, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical & Health Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001, India. 3Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Mharaj Vinayak Global University, Dhand, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302038, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/potj.0974.5777.13120.4

Abstract

 

Introduction: Stork is a global epidemic and an important cause of morbidity and mortality. As defined by WHO stroke is “rapidly developing clinical sings of focal (or global) disturbance of cerebral function, with symptoms lasting 24 hours or longer or leading to death, no apparent cause other that of vascular origin.”1 Stroke due to cerebral infarction, primary intracerebral hemorrhage (PICH), intraventricular hemorrhage, and most cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH); it excludes subdural hemorrhage, epidural hemorrhage, or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or infarction caused by infection or tumour.2,3 Aim of the Study: Compare the effectiveness of mCIMT and Mirror Therapy (MT) on upper extremity and hand functions among individuals with stroke based on the severity as assessed by the UEFM and ARAT. Methods: It is an experimental study design. Sample of convenience of twelve (12) stroke subjects are selected and divided into group A and group B. Group A received Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) and group B received Mirror Therapy in upper extremity and hand functions in stroke patients. Discussion: In our study Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) is more effective than Mirror Therapy (MT) in upper extremity and hand functions in stroke patients. Joachim Liepert et al., 2000. The mechanism of this massive cortical reorganization probably reflects eitheran increase in the excitability of neurons already involved in the innervation of more-affected hand movements or an increase in excitable neuronal tissue in the infracted hemisphere, or both.26 Conclusion: This study concluded that Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) is more effective than Mirror Therapy (MT) in upper extremity and hand functions in stroke patients. In this study the patients from mild to moderate and moderate to severe post stroke disability improved better in stroke patients. So hypothesis is accepted that mCIMT is more effective than Mirror Therapy (MT) in from
mild to moderate and moderate to severe post stroke disability.
Keywords: mCIMT, Mirror therapy (MT) UEFM, ARAT. (VAS) visual analog scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment
scale and Action research arm test (ARAT) scores
 


Corresponding Author : Niraj Kumar