Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Pathology: Research and Practice

Volume  7, Issue 10, October 2018, Pages 1069-1072
 

Original Article

Significance of Masood’s Scoring Index in Cytological Diagnosis of Palpable Breast Lumps: A 3 Years Restrospective Studies

Niranjan Jayaram1, Harini V.R.2, Shivarudrappa A.S.3

1Associate Professor 2Tutor 3Professor and Head, Dept. of Pathology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560066, India

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijprp.2278.148X.71018.4

Abstract

 Introduction: Breast lump is the commonest presentation of breast diseases. Diagnosis of breast diseases can be made out based on history, physical examination and investigations, like cytology, histology and radiology. Several studies have shown that triple tests consisting of clinical, cytopathological and radiological examinations are more accurate, when all the three are positive; the accuracy approaches almost 100% for malignancy. Materials and methods: A 3 years retrospective study was performed in the Department of Pathology in a tertiary care centre. The cytological slides and corresponding histological slides were retrieved from the archives, and the cytological smears of palpable breasts were assessed. Statistical analysis: concordance study between conventional, MMSI and comparison with Histopathology.

Results: A total 226 patients with palpable breast lump were included in the study. A total of 18 cases were diagnosed by histopathology and there was 100% correlation between conventional and post MMSI diagnosis. A total of 144 cases were diagnosed in this category by histopathology 134 (94.4%), cases showed correlation, whereas 2 (1.4%) were under diagnosed as non proliferative breast diseases and 6 (4.2%) were over diagnosed as carcinoma by conventional cytology. Proliferative breast diseases with atypia. Out of 6 cases diagnosed on histopathology, MMSI showed 100% correlation, whereas conventional cytology 2 cases were under diagnosed as category 2 and 2 cases were correctly categorized as category 3, and 2 cases were over diagnosed as category 4. Carcinoma in situ/ Carcinoma. Out of 58 cases diagnosed by histopathology, 52 (89.7%) showed correlation with MMSI and conventional smears. 6 (10.3%)cases were under diagnosed and categorized as category 3 by MMSI. 4 cases (6.9%) were under diagnosed and categorized as category 2 and 2 cases (3.4%) were under diagnosed and categorized to category 1 by conventional cytology. Conclusion: The present study concludes that Masood’s modified scoring index has better diagnostic accuracy than conventional cytology method in diagnosing proliferative breast diseases without atypia and proliferative breast diseases with atypia, which is very useful in management of patents. 

Keywords: Breast Carcinoma; Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology; Tumor Grading; Proliferative Breast Diseases; Atypia.


Corresponding Author : Niranjan Jayaram, Associate Professor, Dept. of Pathology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560066, India