Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Journal of Nurse Midwifery and Maternal Health

Volume  9, Issue 3,  September - December 2023, Pages 103-109
 

Review Article

Historical Evolution of Birthing Positions and Factors Hindering the Trial of Alternate Birthing Positions

Jissa Donel 1, Anuchitra Radhakrishnan 2

1 Nursing Tutor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur 492099, Chhattisgarh, India, 2 Faculty, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, SDS TRC & Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Chest Diseases, College of Nursing, Bengaluru 560029, Karnataka, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/jnmmh.2454.7506.9323.3

Abstract

Aim: Review aims to throw light on the historical evolution of various birthing positions used, scientific relevance of alternate birthing positions, the circumstances that led to a shift in birthing position to horizontal ones and the factors currently existing nowadays that hinders the adoption of alternate birthing positions.

Background: Evidence-based knowledge suggests that the positions taken by women during labour have a tremendous effect on the maternal and neonatal birth outcomes. Women in birth should be permitted to select the position of their choice to birth, preferably alternative birthing positions (including upright, kneeling, squatting and lateral positions) during labour. Now a days, most parturients deliver in a semi-recumbent, lithotomy or dorsal, positions. Hospital admission of laboring women leads to disruptive practices that restrains spontaneous and instinctive attitude of laboring women and the focus is strictly only on intrapartum fetal wellbeing and maternal co morbidities. Respect to women’s choice of birthing position and comfort is mostly underrated.

Clinical Significance: Traditionally, laboring women used physiologically appropriate labor positions such as sitting up right, squatting, and even standing in the birthing process. A pregnant woman delivered her infant in more natural physical positions that allowed for flexing of the hips, straightening the pelvis and facilitating the use of gravity, all of which facilitated the fetus moving through the birth canal. Birthing positions can serve as a nonmedical intervention to improve birth outcomes.

Understanding of scientific relevance of alternate birthing positions, the circumstances that led to a shift in birthing position to horizontal ones and the factors currently existing nowadays that hinders the adoption of alternate birthing positions can help in adopting policies and practices that can promote position changes during labour process that suits the choice, satisfaction and comfort of mother also leading to a positive child birth experience.
 


Keywords : Birth; Labour positions; Feto Maternal Outcomes.
Corresponding Author : Jissa Donel,