Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volume  3, Issue 1, January - June 2015, Pages 19-27
 

Review Article

Need to Redefine the Glucose Challenge Test Threshold in Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Taruna B*, Priya Ballal K*, Raina C*

*Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI:https://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijog.2321.1636.3115.4

Abstract

Aim of the study: To determine the need to change the present glucose challenge threshold value in screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) among women in Dakshina Kannada and neighboring areas. Study Design: Retrospective and Cross Sectional study. Materials & Methods: 997 patients were analysed in the retrospective study having a GCT done between 24 – 28 weeks from October 2009 to October 2010 and complications of GDM observed in them. A mean GCT was identified above which complications (maternal and fetal/neonatal) were noted. Following this, in the cross sectional study done between November 2010 to September 2011, 209 patients were identified as having a GCT above that determined by the retrospective study. They were subjected to a 100g glucose threshold test to diagnose GDM (using Carpenter Couston values). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value was calculated for each GCT threshold value. Results: The mean GCT at which complications of GDM were observed in the retrospective study was 123.56 (maternal complications) and 124.15 (fetal/ neonatal complications). In the Cross Sectional Study, therefore, 124 mg/dl was taken as the cut off above which women were subjected to a 100g oral GTT. The ROC curve identified a value of 143mg/dl showing a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 72.3%. A value of 135mg/dl, however showed a high sensitivity (91%) which is required in a high prevalence area. This value had a moderate specificity (52%). Conclusion: A high prevalence area like ours requires a GCT threshold with a high sensitivity which in our study was observed at a threshold value of 135mg/dl. 


Corresponding Author : Taruna B*