Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Urology, Nephrology and Andrology International

Volume  3, Issue 1, January- June 2018, Pages 11-14
 

Original Article

Indications and Long Term Outcomes of Plasmapheresis in Neurological Disorders

Vishnu R.S.1, Sandeep Sreedharan2, Zachariah Paul Polachirakkal3, Anil Mathew4, George Kurian5, Rajesh Nair6

1DM Resident 2Assistant Professor 3Assistant Professor 4Professor 5Professor 6Professor & Head, Department of Nephrology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala 682041, India

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/unai.2456-5016.3118.2

Abstract

Background: Plasmapheresis is the treatment of choice in several immune mediated neurological disorders such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and myasthenia gravis. There are only a few studies from India that have looked in to the outcomes and complications related to therapeutic plasmapheresis in neurological disorders. This study was done to examine the indications, complications and outcomes of plasmapheresis in neurological disorders.

Materials & Methods: A retrospective study of patients who underwent plasmapheresis for neurological disorders during last five years was done. Demographic, clinical data, indications, complications related to the procedure, clinical outcome and long term follow up data were collected and analyzed.

Results: Data of sixty patients, who underwent a total of 276 sessions of plasmapheresis were analyzed. Fifty two percent were males and mean age was 45 years. Twenty nine patients (49%) had Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy, 14 (23%) had Myasthenia Gravis and four patients had Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (7%). Other indications were Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy, transverse myelitis, polymyositis, autoimmune encephalitis, muscular dystrophy, neuromyeltis optica and Febrile infection related epilepsy syndrome. In patients with AIDP, 26 patients (89%) improved. In patients with MG 11 patients (78%) improved. All patients with Autoimmune encephalitis, Polymyositis, Transverse myelitis and Neuromyelitisoptica showed improvement. There was no improvement in patients with Muscular dystrophy and FIRES. Allergic reactions to plasma, intravascular hemolysis and hypotension were the side effects noted which were managed efficiently during procedure. Mild coagulopathy was observed in three patients, but there were no bleeding complications. There were no other significant complications related to procedure. After a mean follow up period of 3 years, 35 patients had complete remission, 10 patients had relapse, 2 patients died whereas 13 patients lost to follow up.

Conclusion: Plasmapheresis is an effective and safe treatment modality in various immune mediated neurological disorders.

Keywords: Plasmapheresis; AIDP; Myasthenia Gravis.

 


Corresponding Author : Sandeep Sreedharan, Assistant Professor, Department of Nephrology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences,Amrita Viswa vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala 682041, India.