Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Ophthalmology and Allied Sciences

Volume  5, Issue 1, January-April 2019, Pages 75-80
 

Original Article

Evaluation of Anterior Chamber Angle by Ultrasound Biomicroscopy and Gonioscopy in Glaucoma Patients and Glaucoma Suspects

Shoaib Arshad1, Shashi Jain2, Sujata Lakhtakia3 Amreen Khan4, Mahesh Banik5 , Mohd Khalil Mansuri

1Senior Resident, Dept. of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh 464001, India. 2Professor and Head 3Associate Professor, Dept. of Ophthalmology, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh 486001, India. 4Post Graduate Resident, Dept. of Community Medicine, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462001, India. 5Consultant Ophthalmologist, Shivanand Mission Eye Hospital, Virnagar, Gujarat 360060, India. 6Consultant Ophthalmologist, Akhand Jyoti Eye Hospi

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/oas.2454.7816.5119.13

Abstract

 Glaucoma is the second most common cause of blindness and the leading cause of irreversible type of blindness worldwide. Objective: To correlate the angles assessed and categorized by gonioscopy, with the quantified value of angles by the UBM. Method: Participants: Patients having open and closed angles coming to the glaucoma clinic were selected for this study. Grade 0 to Grade 4 were assigned to temporal quadrants of the angles of participants using Shaffer’s classification. Quantification of angles was done by ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) using following biometric parameters namely- Angle opening distance at 500µ (AOD 500) from the scleral spur and trabecular meshwork-ciliary process distance (TCPD). Schaffer’s Grade 0,1 and 2 were classified as “narrow angles” and Schaffer’s Grade 3 and 4 as “open angles”. Outcome Measures: Measurements of UBM were calculated and analyzed in relation to measurements of Gonioscopy. Results: Two hundred eyes of 100 patients were analyzed. 96 eyes had “narrow angles” and 104 eyes had “open angles” on gonioscopy. The difference of means calculated by UBM and angle grade estimated by Gonioscopy was significant (p<0.001). The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated using all UBM parameters and gonioscopy grades which came out significant at the 0.01. Conclusions: The estimated of angle width done by gonioscopy significantly correlated with the angle dimensions those measured by the UBM. Gonioscopy, is thus a reliable method for estimation of the angle width, although it is a subjective test.

Keywords: Glaucoma; Ultrasound Bio-Microscopy; Gonioscopy; Aod; Tcpd.


Corresponding Author : Shashi Jain