Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  6, Issue 4, July-August 2019, Pages 1377-1382
 

Original Article

Crystalloid Preload Versus Crystalloid Co-load During Elective Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia

Naveed Abrar1, Ahmedi Fathima2, Waseem Anjum3

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
60 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.6419.45

Abstract

Background and Aim: Spinal anesthesia is a preferred technique of anesthesia for pregnant women undergoing caesarean section. The major disadvantage with this technique is maternal hypotension which carries the greatest risk to mother and foetus. This study was designed to analyse various advantages and disadvantages associated with crystalloid preloading and co-loading during spinal anesthesia. Methods: Hundred parturients aged 20 to 40 years of physical status ASA I and II undergoing elective caesarean section under SAB were divided into two groups with 50 patients in each group. In Crystalloid Preload group, 15 ml/kg of Ringer lactate (RL) was preloaded 20 minutes before spinal anesthesia. In Co-load group, 15 ml/kg of RL was coloaded 20 minutes just after lumbar puncture. Vital parameters were noted before and after giving spinal anesthesia. Results: The occurence of hypotension (SBP < 100 mmHg) in Group P is 30% and 20% in Group C which is statistically insignificant (p = 0.35). The incidence of nausea is 8% & 6% in group P & group C respectively (p = 0.69). The incidence of vomiting is 2% in group P & 4% in group C (p = 0.55). Mephentermine was used in 19 patients in Group P & 13 patients in Group C which is statistically insignificant. Conclusion: Both preloading and co-loading with RL have similar effect on occurence of hypotension in pregnant women receiving spinal anesthesia. Precious time need not be wasted in preloading. Periodic measurement of BP in parturients for early detection of hypotension and administration of vasopressors for maintaining BP close to baseline can ensure better outcome.


Keywords : Subarachnoid block; Hypotension; Crystalloid preloading; Crystalloid co-loading.
Corresponding Author : Ahmedi Fathima