Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  5, Issue 11, November 2018, Pages 1872-1879
 

Original Article

Evaluation of Dexmedetomidine as an Additive to Ropivacaine for Popliteal Approach for Sciatic Nerve Block for Foot Surgeries

Pallavi Ahluwalia1, Payal Jain2, Amit Ahluwalia3

1Professor 2Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh 244001, India. 3Consultant Orthopaedics, Kothiwal Dental College and Research Hospital, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh 244001, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.51118.15

Abstract

  Introduction: Peripheral nerve blocks are used in varieties of surgical and diagnostic procedures. Various methods or approaches have been tried to prolong the duration of nerve blocks. Dexmedetomidine acts selectively on alpha­2 adrenergic receptor agonist and can be a promising adjuvant to local anaesthetics. Our study evaluates the clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine added to Ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block. Material and Methods: Patients undergoing foot surgeries were divided randomly into two groups. Group RS (n = 30): received 19.5 ml of 0.75% Ropivacaine and 0.5 ml saline for sciatic nerve block via popliteal approach and Group RD (n = 30): received 19.5 ml of 0.75% Ropivacaine with 0.5 ml (50 mg) of dexmedetomidine. Result: The onset time of sensory block (mean) in minutes was 8.64±2.4 in RS Group, 5.78±2.7 in RD Group (p < 0.001). The mean time for onset of motor block, in minutes, was 10.42±3.6 in RS Group, 8.78±1.7 in RD Group (p < 0.001). The difference in regards to duration of sensory and motor block was statistically significant, with RD Group faring better than RS Group. The mean time to rescue analgesia, in minutes, was 339.8±29.31 in Group RS and 512.43±30.92 in Group RD (p < 0.001). The quality of anaesthesia was better and sedation scores were more in group RD versus group RS. Conclusion: The overall quality of anesthesia achieved with 50 g dexmedetomidine as an additive to 0.75% Ropivacaine is more effective in terms of duration and intensity of analgesia in comparison to 0.75% Ropivacaine alone. 


Keywords : Adrenergic 2­Receptor Agonists; Ultrasonography; Dexmedetomidine; Sciatic Nerve.
Corresponding Author : Pallavi Ahluwalia, Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College, Moradabad­244001, U.P., India.