Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  5, Issue 3, March 2018, Pages 415-418
 

Original Article

Comparison of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway Versus Endotracheal Tube in Anaesthetized Adult Patients

Saranjit Singh1, Sapna Bansal2, Rahul Midda3, Dhanwant Kaur4, Preet5, Kanav Sharma6, Neetika Sarwal7

1,4Professor 2Associate Professor 3Senior Resident 5,6,7Postgraduate Resident, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana 133207, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5318.10

Abstract

Endotracheal tube (ETT) is always considered as a standard device to keep an airway patent during surgery. Airway management of patients has also progressed form endotracheal tube to lesser invasive laryngeal mask airway. The proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) is a recently introduced supraglottic airway device. It provides higher seal pressure and offer a better protection against regurgitation and gastric insufflation. Aims and Objective: To compare the efficacy of PLMA and ETT in terms of pulmonary ventilation, ease and no of attempts of placement and hemodynamic parameters. Material and Method: A prospective, simple randomized and comparative study was carried out after ethical committee approval in 60 patients, aged 20-50 years, with ASA grade I and II of either gender undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia at tertiary care centre in india during 2015 and 2016 to compare the efficacy of PLMA and ETT in terms of pulmonary ventilation, ease and no of attempts of placement and hemodynamic parameters. Result: Both the groups were comparable regarding age, gender, height and baseline vitals. Patients intubated with PLMA showed no or minimal change in heart rate and mean arterial pressure as compared to ETT. The intubation time was comparable in both groups. The two groups were comparable with respect to number of attempts required for insertion of both the devices, (P> 0.05). Conculsion: The comparative study showed PLMA has a good hemodynamic stability. It is concluded from our study that placement of PLMA is relatively easy and simple. The performance of PLMA is as good as the conventional ETT in providing general anaesthesia.

 

 


Keywords : Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway; Regurgitation; Insufflation and Hemodynamic. 
Corresponding Author : Dr. Sapna Bansal, Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana 133207, India.