Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  5, Issue 2, February 2018, Pages 246-252
 

Original Article

Intravenous Dexmedetomidine versus Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam Combination for Paediatric Sedation in MRI Room: A Randomized Study

R. Krishna Prabu1, Stanley Sebastian2

1Professor 2Post Graduate, Department of Anesthesiology, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Ariyur, Puducherry 605102, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.5218.16

Abstract

Background: Sedation is a necessity for MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) procedures in children for alleviating anxiety and to avoid movements during the procedure. Dexmedetomidine a selective alpha-2 adrenoreceptor agonist is very useful for such procedures. Aims and Objectives: To analyze and compare the sedative, hemodynamic and respiratory effect of Intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine with IV dexmedetomidine and midazolam combination in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination. Material and Methods: Total of 60 patients were studied, 30 in each group, group D and group DM. Group D received inj. Dexmedetomidine 2mcg/kg, Group DM received dexmedetomidine 2mcg/kg and inj. Midazolam 0.03 mg/kg intravenously. The level of sedation was assessed by the Ramsay sedation scale and quality of MRI was assessed using the 3 point scale. During the procedure, respiratory rate, heart rate, oxygen saturation and blood pressure were continuously monitored and recorded using MRI compatible monitors. The data were analysed using SPSS version 24.0. Results: There was significant difference in onset of sedation; the mean values ranged 6.3±2.28 minutes (mins) and 3.23±3.02 minutes for D and DM group respectively (p < 0.05). There was significant difference in the Level of sedation; the mean values ranged 4.57±0.57 and 5.27±0.52 for D and DM group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in blood pressure values at various time periods between the two groups. The quality of MRI is better in Group DM than group D. There was no significant difference in heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation values at various time periods between the two groups. 4 patients in Group D received supplementation, whereas none in group DM received supplementation. Conclusion: Addition of midazolam to dexmedetomidine for sedation helped in decreasing the onset of sedation and also offered a better quality of MRI study without any haemodynamic or respiratory disturbances.


Keywords : Dexmedetomidine; Hemodynamic; Midazolam; MRI; Respiratory; Sedation. 
Corresponding Author : Stanley Sebastian, Post Graduate, Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Ariyur, Puducherry 605102, India.