Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  9, Issue 1, January-Febuary 2022, Pages 15-19
 

Original Article

A Comparison of Analgesic Effect of Different Doses of Intrathecal Nalbuphine Hydrocloride with Bupivacaine and Bupivacaine alone for Lower Abdominal and Orthopedic Surgeries

Mude Bhaskar Naik 1, Vinayak S Sirsat 2, Shailendra Chauhan 3, Deepak M Kokane 4

1 Junior Resident, 2,4 Associate Professor, 3 Professor and HOD, Government Medical College, Latur, Maharashtra 413736, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.9122.2

Abstract

Objective: To compare the analgesic effect of different doses of nalbuphine when added to bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia. To compare the onset of sensory blockade (time taken form 3, 5 min and then every 5 min until the end of the procedure.

Methods: 100 ASA grade 1 and 2 patients grouped into group A, group B, group C and group D randomly. Age group of 18-60 years. Patient undergoing elective lower abdominal and orthopedic surgery received with Group A : included 25patients with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 3 cc (15mg) + N.S. 0.2 ml. Group B: included 25 patients with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (3 cc) 15 mg + 0.8mg nalbuphine + N.S. 0.2 ml. Group C: included 25 patients with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (3 cc) 15 mg + 1.6mg nalbuphine + N.S. 0.2 ml. Group D: included 25 patients with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (3 cc) 15 mg + 2.4 mg nalbuphine + N.S. 0.2 ml.

Results: The mean sensory onset of study subjects in group A, B, C and D were 8.4±0.5, 5±0.9, 5.6±1 and 8.2±1.4 respectively and this difference was statistically significant. The mean motor onset of study subjects in group A, B, C and D were 10.2±0.7, 6.8±0.9, 6.1±1.2 and 8.6±1.1 respectively and this difference was statistically significant. The mean sensory duration of study subjects in group A, B, C and D were 176.8±29.3, 282±6.8, 300.2±6.6 and 286.2±9.8 respectively and this difference was statistically significant. The mean time for maximum sensory level of study subjects in group A, B, C and D were 11.5±1, 8.8±0.8, 5.6±1.6 and 8.2±1.2 respectively and this difference was statistically significant. The mean T 10 time of study subjects in group A, B, C and D were 8.5±0.5, 8.7±0.7, 5.6±1.6 and 8.6±1 respectively and this difference was statistically significant. The mean time for 2 segment regression of study subjects in group A, B, C and D were 76.6±2, 92.2±2.3, 95.8±3 and 90.6±4.4 respectively and this difference was statistically significant. The mean motor duration of study subjects in group A, B, C and D were 179.8±8.9, 184.6±6, 203.2±7 and 187±9.9 respectively and this difference was statistically significant. The mean analgesic duration of study subjects in group A, B, C and D were 175.8±4.1, 271.1±7.8, 303.8±9.9 and 279±10.7 respectively and this difference was statistically significant.

Conclusion: We came to conclusion that 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (15mg) with nalbuphine (0.8mg, 1.6 mg, 2.4 mg) in subarachnoid block. Therefore addition of 1.6 mg nalbuphine to 15mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 15 mg in subarachnoid block can be considered safe with minimum complication, and provides excellent quality and longer duration of postoperative analgesia with good sedation compared with 0.8 mg and 2.4 of nalbuphine. So it is useful for prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia.


Keywords : Analgesic Effect; Intrathecal Nalbuphine; Orthopedic Surgeries.
Corresponding Author : Deepak M Kokane