Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  8, Issue 3, May-June 2021, Pages 349-356
 

Original Article

Comparison of Nerve Stimulator Guided and Ultrasound Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Shoulder Surgery

Sucheta Tidke1, Divya Choudhary2, Sunil Tidke3, Dhiraj Bhandari4, Benhur P5, Sudha Jain6

1Professor and Head, 2Post graduate student, 4,5,6Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sewagram, Wardha, Maharashtra 442102, India. 3Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh 484001, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.8321.50

Abstract

 

Introduction: This study was conducted to compare the two techniques, Nerve stimulator guided and Ultrasound guidance for Interscalene brachial plexus block in shoulder and upper arm surgeries. Methods: Total 80 patients were included in our study which were randomly allotted by sealed envelope technique two groups namely US-guided (Group US) or NS-guided (group NS). The drug mixture of 0.375% bupivacaine and 0.5% lignocaine with 1:200000 adrenaline was used. Results: Comparison between the Nerve Stimulator (NS) and Ultrasound guided (US) technique of interscalene brachial plexus block revealed that the number of pricks(1-77.5%, 2-20%, 3-2.5% in US group and 1-52.5%, 2-35%, 3-12.5% in NS group), block execution time (5.32(0.50) min in US and 7.10 (0.62) min in NS group), time of onset of sensory and motor block was significantly less in US group ascompare to NS groups. The recovery from sensory (11.9 (1.19) hrs in US and 8.74(0.71) hrs in NS, p=0.0001) and motor block (6.76(0.63) hrs in US and 5.35 (0.48) hrs in NS group, p=0.001) also was significantly longer US group than in NS group. VAS scores were significantly lower in group US group than in NS group in post operative periods. The incidence blockade failure requiring general anesthesia was not significant. Block was successful in 95% of cases in US group and 85% of cases in NS group. Conclusion: Effective quality of the block, execution time, onset of sensory and motor block, recovery from sensory and motor block and VAS scores were more satisfactory with ultrasound technique than the nerve stimulator technique.


Keywords : Interscalene block; Nerve stimulator; USG guidance.
Corresponding Author : Dhiraj Bhandari, Department of Anesthesiology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sewagram, Wardha, Maharashtra 442102, India.