Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  8, Issue 1, Jan-feb 2021, Pages 97-102
 

Original Article

Comparison between Ultrasound Guided Peritubular Infiltration and Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Pain Relief in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Vino Barathi Karunanithi1, Kumaresan Sathappan2, Anbu Murugaraj Annamalai3

1 Assistant Professor, 2-3 Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Melmaruvathur, Tamil Nadu 603319, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.8121.13

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy is most advanced and preferred technique for Renal calculi but associated with pain and discomfort in postoperative period. Aim of our study is to compare analgesic efficacy of peritubular infiltration with paravertebral block under Ultrasound guidance for postoperative pain relief.

Methods: In this prospective randomised study total 60 adult patients were allocated in two equal groups (A, B). After undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia group A patients received peritubular infiltration of 15ml of 0.25% inj.bupivacaine with inj. Dexmeditomidine 1ug/kg and group B patients received 15ml of 0.25% inj.bupivacaine with inj. Dexmeditomidine 1ug/kg in Paravertebral space T11, T12, L1 under ultrasound guidance. Postoperatively hemodynamic variables, VAS, Dynamic VAS, mean time for 1st demand of analgesia and total consumption of inj.tramadol were noted in both groups.

Results: At 4, 8, 12 hrs VAS, Dynamic VAS scores were lower in group B compared to group A(p<0.005). Hemodynamic variables were comparable between groupsand demand for first rescue analgesia time were higher in paravertebral block group compared to peritubular infiltration group and total consumption of tramadol were low in paravertebral block.

Conclusion: Paravertebral block under ultrasound guidance is an effective analgesia for
PCNL in postoperative period compared to peritubular infiltration.


Keywords : Paravertebral block; Peritubular infiltration; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Corresponding Author : Vino Barathi Karunanithi1,