Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  7, Issue 6, November-December 2020, Pages 1365-1372
 

Original Article

A Comparitive Evaluation of Propofol, Sevoflurane and Desflurane for Neuroanaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Elective Supratentorial Craniotomies

B Sowbhagyalaxshmi1, P Krishna Prasad2, M Santhi Sree3

1Professor and HOD, 2,3Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Rangaraya Medical College, Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh 533001, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.7620.71

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effects of propofol, sevoflurane and desflurane in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomies under general anaesthesia with regard to, perioperative haemodynamic stability, emergence and recovery characteristics.

Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized study of 150 adult patients belonging to both sexes undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomies under general anaesthesia were takenup for study and divided into three groups of 50 each. Group P : Anaesthesia was induced with Inj. Thiopentone sodium and maintained with 66% nitrous oxide (N20), in 33% oxygen (02) and Propofol (3-6mg/kg/hr) Group S: Anaesthesia was induced with Inj.Thiopentone sodium and maintained with 66% nitrous oxide (N2O) in 33% oxygen (O2) and Sevoflurane. (1-2%) Group D: Anaesthesia was induced with Inj. Thiopentone sodium and maintained with 66% N 2O and 33% O2 and Desflurane. (4-6%). The effects of Propofol, Desflurane and Sevoflurane on haemodynamics and recovery characteristics were observed.

Results: In Desflurane Group the mean time taken for response to verbal commands was 4.61±0.47 min, spontaneous eye opening was 5.3±0.49 min,to squeezing fingers and lift limb was 6.17 ± 0.31 min. While the mean time taken for extubation was 7.72±0.53 min and time taken to orientation to place, name was 9.38±0.52min. These desflurane values are very much lower than the other two groups.

Conclusion: We conclude that Desflurane as the inhalational agent ensures faster recovery in the early postoperative period as evident from significant decrease in the time required for extubation and the time requiredtoachieveamodifiedAldretescoreof≥9whencomparedtopatientsreceivingSevofluraneand Propofol.

 


Keywords : Desflurane; Sevoflurane; Propofol; Emergence; Recovery.
Corresponding Author : P Krishna Prasad