Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  7, Issue 5, September – October 2020, Pages 1107-1112
 

Original Article

A Randomized Controlled Study of The Efficacy of Addition of Clonidine to Bupivacaine as Compared with Bupivacaine Alone used in Supracalvicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgeries

Leno Ninan Jacob1, Balaji Ramamurthy2

1Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Believers Church Medical College Hospital, Thiruvalla 689103, Kerala, India 2Associate Professor Department of Anesthesiology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre Kattangulathur, Tamil Nadu 603203, India

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.7520.34

Abstract

Introduction: Regional nerve blocks of the upper extremity avoid the polypharmacy and stress of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation associated with general anaesthesia. Drug administration at the supraclavicular level offers comprehensive anaesthesia for the complete limb. Post-operative analgesia may be provided by either adding additives to the local anaesthetics or placing a catheter in place. Clonidine (alpha 2 adrenergic receptor agonist) is a classic additive to local anaesthetic in various regional procedures.

Aim: To compare efficacy of clonidine added as an adjuvant to bupivacaine with plain bupivacaine alone in supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Methodology: Fifty ASA I and II patients coming for upper limb surgeries were assigned randomly into two equal groups. Group S: received 35 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine and 0.5 ml of normal saline 0.9%. Group C: received 35 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine and Clonidine 75mcg (0.5 ml). Onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade and complications, if any were documented.

Results: Demographic variables were comparable. There was a statistically significant faster onset and prolonged duration of block in clonidine group when compared to plain bupivacaine (p<0.05). Clonidine also produced sedation which however did not require any clinical intervention.

Conclusion: We conclude that clonidine causes earlier onset, prolongs the duration of sensory and motor block with sedation and without any significant clinical side effects when added to bupivacaine in brachial plexus block


 


Keywords : Bupivacaine; Clonidine; Brachial plexus block
Corresponding Author : Balaji Ramamurthy