Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  7, Issue 2, Mar-Apr 2020, Pages 593-600
 

Original Article

Evaluation of Airway Blocks Vs General Anesthesia for Diagnostic Direct Laryngoscopy and Biopsy for Carcinoma Larynx: A Comparative Study

Gouthami M., Padmavathi Bodiga

1,2Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Gandhi Medical College, Padmarao Nagar, Secunderabad, Telangana 500003, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.7220.22

Abstract

Aims: Evaluation of airway blocks vs general anesthesia for diagnostic direct laryngoscopy & biopsy for carcinoma larynx it is a comparative study. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 patients between the age
group 50–70 years were included in the study. They were ASA Grade 3 or 4 and scheduled for Laryngeal biopsy under anesthesia. Patients were randomized in two groups, Group A received airway blocks with
2% lignocaine and Group B received general anesthesia. Group A patients received bilateral superior laryngeal nerve block, glossopharyngeal nerve block and transtracheal block. Group B patients received general anesthesia. Patients were monitored during anesthesia using continuous ECG, NIBP and Pulseoximetry.
Intraoperative IV fluids were given according to the protocols. Vital data was recorded preoperatively and during direct laryngoscopy at every 5 minutes interval. Results: Preoperative vitals were same in both
groups and statistically there was no significant difference in the data. Mean arterial pressures were raised during postoperative period. The postop analgesia was significantly higher in Group A and lasted longer as compared to Group B and patients were less agitated and calm. In Group B patients, most of them required postop nebulization as compared to Group A where no patient needed nebulization. Conclusion: Laryngeal biopsies done under regional airway blocks have less of hemodynamic changes and good analgesia in postop period, compared to cases done under general anesthesia.


Keywords : Laryngoscopy; Biopsy; Carcinoma larynx; Glossopharyngeal nerve block.
Corresponding Author : Padmavathi Bodiga