Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volume  7, Issue 2, Mar-Apr 2020, Pages 547-553
 

Original Article

Comparison between Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam for Postoperative Analgesia and Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Shishir KR, Hassaan Muhammed, Ravikumar Manchala

1Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore, Karnataka 560066, India 2Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, PES Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh 517425, India. 3Attending consultant, Sakra World Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka 560103, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijaa.2349.8471.7220.16

Abstract

 

Context: Postoperative patients requiring mechanical ventilation in surgical ICU’s require adequate sedation and analgesia in order to modulate physiological response to stress and pain, hence reducing morbidity and mortality in the ICU. The consequences of inadequate sedation and analgesia can be sustained, including selfremoval of intraluminal tubes and vascular catheters, aggressive behavior by patients against care providers, and poor patient-ventilator synchrony. Oversedation can lead to prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation,
more prolonged ICU, and hospital stays. Aims: To evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in postoperative mechanically ventilated patients. Study Design: Arandomized prospective study. Methods: 100 patients aged above 18 years after major abdominal or pelvic surgeries requiring a minimum of 6 hours of artificial ventilation admitted to intensive care units were included as subjects, and they were randomly divided into two groups of fifty each. Group D received Dexmedetomidine, a loading dose of 2.5 μg/kg, and a maintenance dose of 0.5 g/kg/hr, and Group M received Midazolam a loading dose of 0.05 mg/kg and a maintenance dose of 0.025 mg/kg/hr. Both groups were compared for the level of sedation using Ramsay sedation score, hemodynamic variables, safety profile. Statistical analysis used: Chi-square test and Student’s unpaired t-test. Results: Ramsay sedation score was within the desired level (2–4) in both
dexmedetomidine and midazolam group (p > 0.05). Patients who received dexmedetomidine infusion had significantly lower heart rates compared to patients who received midazolam infusion (p < 0.00), there
were no significant differences in SBP, DBP, MAP and oxygen saturation between two groups. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine and midazolam are safe sedative drugs for postoperative mechanically ventilated patients.
Patients were easily aroused to cooperate without signs of irritation within the dexmedetomidine group.


Keywords : Dexmedetomidine; Midazolam; Mechanical ventilation.
Corresponding Author : Hassaan Muhammed