Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Waste Management

Volume  2, Issue 2, July-December 2018, Pages 45-47
 

Original Article

Distribution Uniformity and Uniformity Coefficient of Selected Microsprinklers

R.D. Bansod

Head, Dept. of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth Rahuri, Maharashtra 413722, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI:

Abstract

 Five different types of microsprinklers were selected for identification as M-1, M-11, M-111, M-IV and M-V) for studying the Merrium and Keller Distribution Uniformity (DU) and Christiansen’s Uniformity Coefficient (UCC). The DU and UCC were studied at different spacing of microsprinkles and different pressures. The pressures were in the range of 1.0 to 2.0 kg/cm2 with and increment of 0.5 kg/cm2 and the spacings between microspinklers were 3 x 3 m to 10 x 10 m with an increment of 1.0 m (i.e. 3 x 3 m, 4 x 4 m ….., 10 x 10.0 m). The M-V has shown maximum UCC, 94.74 percent at 2 kg/cm2 pressure at the psacing of 3 x 3 m., and the lowest by M-IV i.e. 87.52 percent. More than desired value (70%) of UCC was reported only for MS-I for all pressures under consideration and for spacings 3 m x 3 m to 7 m x 7 m which indicates its superiority over other types of microsprinklers. The highest value of DU, 96.90 percent was recorded for M-II at 2.0 kg/cm2.

Keywords: Distribution uniformity; Microsprinkler spacings; Uniformity coeffieicnet.


Corresponding Author : R.D. Bansod