Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
New Indian Journal of Surgery

Volume  9, Issue 4, July - August 2018, Pages 433-435
 

Original Article

Comparison of Modified Alvarado Score with Ultrasonogram in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis at a Tertiary Care Center of Dakshina Kannada

Kiran T.1, Shafeek Ashraf2

1Associate Professor 2Post Graduate, Department of General Surgery, Yenapoya Medical College, University Road, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka 575018, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI:https://dx.doi.org/10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.9418.6

Abstract

Introduction: Acute appendicitis is one of the commonest emergency presenting at general surgery department calling for an emergency appendectomy either by open laparotomy or laparoscopic technique is performed. Thus a rapid yet accurate diagnosis becomes important to prevent wrong procedure.

Objectives: We intend to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Modified Alvarado Score System (MASS) and ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis at our institution in Dakshina kannada.

Materials and methods: A prospective study was conducted between October 2015 to October 2017 at our institution. 100 patients were included in the study after obtaining an informed consent. A detailed clinical examination was performed following which the clinical finding and laboratory findings including total leucocyte count and differential count were in noted in the patient’s study proforma. Patients were then subjected to ultrasound examination for appendicitis. The radiological findings were also then tabulated. Appendectomy was then performed followed by histopathological examination of the specimen for  confirmation of the diagnosis. The histopathological diagnosis of acute appendicitis was considered as positive report and using SPSS software and MEDCALC Software descriptive statistics were calculated for MASS and ultrasound.

Results: Out of 100 patients 52 were males and 48 were females. MASS and ultrasound showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 60%, 90%, 98.18%, 20%, 93.3%, 20%, 91.3%, and 25% respectively. Application of Chi­square test showed that MASS had better correlation histopathological finding with a statistically significant p value of 0.000 (< 0.005).

Conclusion: Both MASS and Ultrasound examination  have a distinct advantage and limitation when used independently. But utilisation of both modalities complementarily serves as a better management strategy in acute appendicitis.

Keywords: MASS; Ultrasound; Sensitivity; Specificity; p value; Complementary Value.

 


Corresponding Author : Shafeek Ashraf, Post Graduate, Department of General Surgery, Yenapoya Medical College, University Road, Deralakatte, Mangalore, Karnataka 575018, India.