Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
New Indian Journal of Surgery

Volume  11, Issue 2, April-June 2020, Pages 93-98
 

Original Article

Use of retrieval bag using drain bag vs direct extraction of gall bladder specimen after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Our experience with 600 patients

Afak Yusuf Sherwani1, Hakeem Vaqar Ahmed2, Rafia Aziz3, Altaf Hussain Shera4

1Consultant, 2Associate Professor, 4Professor and Head, Department of General and Minimal Access Surgery, 3Consultant, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Baramulla, Jammu Kashmir 193101, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21088/nijs.0976.4747.11220.1

Abstract

 

Since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder stones, different types of retrieval devices have been used to extract the gallbladder from the peritoneal cavity. These ranged from simple nonpowdered gloves to several types of commercially produced bags. We compared the advantages and disadvantages of using a retrieval bag (using simple drain cover) with direct extraction of gall bladder
specimen through the epigastric port in 600 patients. We concluded that using a retrieval bag (simple drain cover) for specimen retrieval in laproscopic cholecystectomy is a simple and cheap method with advantages of low rates of spillage andwound infection in comparison to direct retrieval of the specimen.
Keywords: Lap cholecystectomy; Retrieval bag; Wound infection.


Corresponding Author : Afak Yusuf Sherwani