Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Pathology: Research and Practice

Volume  8, Issue 5, September - October 2019, Pages 558-561
 

Original Article

Evaluation of Completeness of Histopathological Requisition Forms Submitted to the Histopathology Section

Bhakti V Kulkarni1, Basavaraj P Bommanahalli2

1Assistant Professor, 2Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences, Gadag, Karnataka 582103, India

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijprp.2278.148X.8519.6

Abstract

Background: Histopathological requisition forms are a mode of communication between clinicians and pathologists. Incomplete requisition forms can significantly impact the quality of histopathological reports. Objective: To determine the degree of completeness of the requisition forms with respect to demographic data and clinical data. Materials and methods: Histopathological requisition forms submitted to the department of Pathology, Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences (GIMS), Gadag from January to December 2018 were evaluated for the completeness of the forms. The data was entered in excel sheet and completeness was assessed by measuring the ratio/percentage of complete cases to total cases. Results: Out of 760 requistion forms, 524 (68.94%) were complete with respect to demographic data. Out of the total 760 forms, 252 (33.15%) were complete with respect to clinical data. Three (0.39%) forms were incomplete with respect to the age. Six (0.78%) forms were incomplete with respect to sex. Clinician’s name was not mentioned in 104 (13.68%) forms. Five (0.65%) cases failed to mention outpatient/inpatient (OP/IP) number. Adequate clinical history and examination findings were not mentioned in 231 (30.3%) of forms and 74 (9.73%) of forms failed to mention clinical diagnosis. Conclusion: In the present study the level of completion of the requisition forms was suboptimal.

Keywords: Requisition forms; Histopathology.


Corresponding Author : Basavaraj P Bommanahalli