Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Pathology: Research and Practice

Volume  7, Issue 4, April 2018, Pages 448-452
 

Original Article

Premalignant Lesions and Incidental Carcinoma in Clinically Diagnosed Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

Tignath Aditya1, Narang Sanjeev2, Singh Anjali3, Nema S.K.4, Misra Vikas5, Singh Jai6

1,5,63rd PG Resident 2Professor 3Associate Professor 4Professor, Index Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh 452001, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijprp.2278.148X.7418.7

Abstract

Background: Histological examination of the prostate must also include the description of some important aspects which are present associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and which may condition the progression of the disease.

Aim: To find out incidence of Prostatic Intraepithelial Lesions (PIN) and incidental carcinoma in clinically diagnosed BPH, and to correlate histological findings with patients age and pre-operative serum PSA (prostate specific antigen) level.

Method and Material: 107 TURP (Trans Urethral Resection of Prostate) specimens were processed and studied. Histomorphological diagnosis is made. Correlation of final histological diagnosis with age and serum PSA level, applying one way ANOVA test, was determined.

Results: Out of 107 cases, the incidence of Low Grade PIN was 2 (1.9%), High Grade PIN was 1 (0.9%) and overall PIN was 3 (2.8%). The incidence of T1a was 4 (3.7%), of T1b was 2 (1.9%) and overall prostatic carcinoma was 6 (5.6%). Of these, there were 2 (33.3%) patients in the Gleason Grade 1 and 4 (66.7%) in the Gleason Grade 2. Statistically significant correlation of these premalignant and malignant lesions is demonstrated in comparison to age, whereas serums PSA level do not show any significant correlation.

Conclusion: Both, adenocarcinoma and PIN can be diagnosed on histopathological examination of TURP specimen. Probability of finding these premalignant lesions as well as incidental carcinoma in association with BPH increases with age.PSA levels are not significant indicator of presence of these lesions.

Keywords: Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia; Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia; Prostatic Adenocarcinoma; Incidental Prostatic Carcinoma. 


Corresponding Author : Anjali Singh Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Index Medical College, Indore, Madhya Pradesh 452001, India.