Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Indian Journal of Pathology: Research and Practice

Volume  7, Issue 1, January 2018, Pages 37-44
 

Original Article

Principles and Pitfalls in Evaluating Early Mycosis Fungoides: Redefining Criteria and Emphasizing Mimics

Chokka Mahesh Kiran*, Anita Ramdas**, Manjiri Phansalkar***, Sheela Kuruvila****

*Associate Professor **,***Professor, Dept. of Pathology, ****Professor, Dept. of Dermatology, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalapet, Puducherry 605014, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijprp.2278.148X.7118.7

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of early Mycosis Fungoides (MF) is quite challenging because of its overlapping clinicopathologic findings with various reactive dermatoses. A comprehensive assessment of clinical history is absolutely essential as pathologic criteria alone are insufficient. Aim: We aimed to diagnose early MF seeking an algorithm proposed by the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphoma (ISCL), define various significant diagnostic criteria and describe the associated clinical and histological mimics. Materials and Methods : Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded and H&E stained sections of forty skin biopsies from thirty nine clinically suspected early MF patients (n = 39) were studied initially. Various clinical and histopathological parameters were recorded followed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with selected markers to arrive at a proper diagnosis. Results: Early MF was diagnosed in 9 patients (23.1%), parapsoriasis in 5 patients (12.8%), psoriasiform dermatitis in 7 patients (17.9%) and spongiotic dermatitis in 5 patients (12.8%). Remaining 13 patients (33.3%) were grouped under miscellaneous category comprising of other reactive dermatoses. Atypical lymphocytes were seen in 8 patients with early MF (n = 9) and 2 patients with parapsoriasis (n = 5). No statistical significance was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05, Fisher’s exact test). Conclusions: Some patients with early MF fail to show the typical histological features of the disease. In such instances, multiple biopsies from different lesions are highly useful and the algorithm developed by ISCL is a valid tool in diagnosis. Epidermotropism is considered as histological hallmark. IHC is not needed in all cases, particularly when the clinical and histopathological features are quite obvious.

Keywords: Algorithm; Early MF; Epidermotropism; ISCL; Reactive Dermatoses. 


Corresponding Author : Author: Chokka Mahesh Kiran, Associate Professor, Dept. of Pathology, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalapet, Puducherry 605014, India.