Advertisement!
Author Information Pack
Editorial Board
Submit article
Special Issue
Editor's selection process
Join as Reviewer/Editor
List of Reviewer
Indexing Information
Most popular articles
Purchase Single Articles
Archive
Free Online Access
Current Issue
Recommend this journal to your library
Advertiser
Accepted Articles
Search Articles
Email Alerts
FAQ
Contact Us
Journal of Microbiology and Related Research

Volume  3, Issue 2, Jul-Dec 2017, Pages 97-100
 

Original Article

Comparison of Different Phenotypic Tests for Detection of ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamases) Producing Pseudomonas Aeruginosa

Soumya S.*, Mahantesh B. Nagmoti**

*Assistant Professor **Professor, Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE University, Nehru Nagar, Belagavi, Karnataka 590010, India.

Choose an option to locate / access this Article:
90 days Access
Check if you have access through your login credentials.        PDF      |
|

Open Access: View PDF

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/jmrr.2395.6623.3217.8

Abstract

Background: P. aeruginosa is the most common nosocomial pathogen encountered and a known organism causing high mortality and morbidity. Due to indiscriminate antibiotic use, resistance is very commonly known in them and ESBL enzyme production being the most predominant one. Material and Methods: A total of Ninty isolates of P. aeruginosa were tested for the presence of ESBL enzyme by both disc diffusion and double disc synergy test. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of ESBL-positive P. aeruginosa was determined. Results: Of the 1200 pus samples screened, 90 isolates of pseudomonas were tested for ESBL production. Of the 90 P.aeruginosa isolates, 57 (63%) were sensitive to 3GC and 33 (37%) were resistant.Of the 33 P.aeruginosa resistant to ceftazidime, DDT detected 9 (27%) of ESBL producers and DDST detected 17 (51%). And 17 (51%) did not show ESBL production by either of the methods used in the study. All the ESBL-positive P. aeruginosa were multi-drug resistant, with 100% sensitivity to imipenem; followed by ofloxacin (70%). Conclusion: From this study, we conclude that DDST proved to be better method than DDT to detect ESBL producing P. aeruginosa. However in the absence of any CLSI guidelines for detection of ESBL in Non-fermenters, we reframe from commenting on specificities of either of tests. There is a strong need for standardization/ CLSI guidelines for detection.

Keywords: Third Generation Cephalosporins; Double Disk Synergy Test; Disc Diffusion Test; P. Aeruginosa. 


Corresponding Author : Soumya S., Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE University, Nehru Nagar, Belagavi, Karnataka 590010, India.